| 李艳,先剑波,白旭.基于 SIPO 的中国人工智能领域专利合作网络演化研究[J].情报工程,2020,6(3):025-041 |
| 基于 SIPO 的中国人工智能领域专利合作网络演化研究 |
| Research on the Evolution of Patent Cooperation Network in the Field of Artificial Intelligence in China Based on SIPO |
| |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2020.03.003 |
| 中文关键词: 人工智能；专利分析；社会网络分析；网络演化 |
| 英文关键词: Artificial intelligence; patent analysis; social network analysis; network evolution |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 李艳 | 北京林业大学经济管理学院 北京 100083； | | 先剑波 | 北京林业大学信息学院 北京 100083 | | 白旭 | 北京林业大学经济管理学院 北京 100083； |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1725 |
| 全文下载次数: 1203 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 人工智能进入大规模场景应用落地的黄金期，本研究揭示了我国人工智能领域专利合作网络的演化过程 , 为我国人工智能资源配置及相关政策的制定提供一定的参考。基于 2010-2018 年的我国人工智能领域 SIPO 合作申请专利数据，本文使用社会网络分析技术，分别对专利技术之间、专利申请人之间的专利合作网络的演化特征进行分析，构建技术与关键专利申请者的二模网络以探讨二者之间的相互影响。本文研究发现，2010-2018 年我国人工智能技术合作关系由孤立散乱到更为紧密集中。我国人工智能专利合作网络中研究机构间的信息交流逐渐密切，且存在结构洞和小世界效应，各研究机构间的独立性和异质性也有所增强。技术与关键研发者相互影响，推动彼此占据合作网络中的优势位置。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Artificial intelligence enters the prime period of large-scale application. This study reveals the evolution of patent cooperation network in the field of artificial intelligence in China, and provides certain decision support for the allocation of artificial intelligence resources and related policies in China. Based on the patent cooperation data from SIPO in the field of artificial intelligence in China from 2010 to 2018, this paper, using social network analysis method, analyzes the evolution characteristics of the patent cooperation network between AI technologies and patent applicants, and builds AI technologies and key patent applicants’ two-mode networks to explore the interaction between them. This results show that China’s artificial intelligence technology cooperation relationship has been scattered from isolation to closer concentration from 2010 to 2018. Computer vision and human-machine dialogue will probably be hot technology application in the next stage. The information exchange between research institutions in China’s artificial intelligence patent cooperation network has gradually become closer. At the same time, independence and heterogeneity among research institutions have also increased. Technology and key developers interact to drive each other’s dominant position in the cooperative network. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
