文章摘要
李璐,许海云,王超,龚兵营,崔斌,齐燕.中美工程学领域高被引科学家的高被引文献对比分析[J].情报工程,2022,8(5):003-015
中美工程学领域高被引科学家的高被引文献对比分析
Comparison of Highly Cited Papers Authored by Highly Cited Scientists in Engineering Fields in China and the United States
  
DOI:10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2022.05.001
中文关键词: 工程学;ESI 高被引文献;中国;美国;文献计量学
英文关键词: Engineering Science; ESI highly cited papers; China; the United States; bibliometrics
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“基于科学 - 技术主题关联分析的创新演化路径识别方法研究”(71704170);山东省青年泰山学 者(青年专家计划)(202103069)。
作者单位
李璐 1. 山东理工大学管理学院 淄博 255000; 
许海云 1. 山东理工大学管理学院 淄博 255000; 
王超 1. 山东理工大学管理学院 淄博 255000; 
龚兵营 1. 山东理工大学管理学院 淄博 255000; 
崔斌 1. 山东理工大学管理学院 淄博 255000; 
齐燕 2. 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所 / 图书馆 北京 100020 
摘要点击次数: 187
全文下载次数: 125
中文摘要:
      [ 目的 / 意义 ] 通过分析和对比中美工程学领域高被引科学家的高被引文献发文特征,以发现中美两国的优劣势,为我国工程学领域发展提供参考信息,并为其他领域提供借鉴。[ 方法 / 过程 ] 以中美两国工程学领域入选 2014—2019年 ESI 高被引科学家名单的科学家为研究对象,基于 Web of Science 核心合集数据库,通过文献计量方法和可视化工具VOSviewer,对上述科学家 2010—2019 年发表的高被引文献从年度发文量、引文影响力、基金资助产出率、合作情况、研究方向等多个维度进行定量定性相结合的对比分析。[ 结果 / 结论 ] 在 2010—2019 年间,中国工程学领域保持较高的发文量和被引量,在国际上已有一定的影响力,但高被引科学家的高被引文献基金资助产出率以及国际合作活跃度等方面尚存在不足,需要制定相关政策对我国工程学领域的发展加以引导。
英文摘要:
      [Objective/Significance] By analyzing and comparing the characteristics of highly cited literatures published by highly cited scientists in the engineering field in China and the United States, this paper discovers the strengths and weaknesses of the two countries, and provides reference information for the development of engineering or other fields in China. [Methods/Processes] This paper examines scientists in engineering from China and the United States who were included in the list of ESI highly cited scientists from 2014—2019. Based on the data from Web of Science Core Collection, bibliometrics method and visualization tool VOSviewer were used to analyze those highly cited scientists. A quantitative and qualitative comparative econometric analysis of the highly cited paper authored by those highly cited scientists from 2010—2019 was conducted by combining multiple dimensions including annual publication volume, citation impact, grant-funded output rate, funding source, collaboration, and layout of research hotspots. [Results/Conclusions] This study finds that China’s engineering field maintain higher number of the published and cited articles in 2010—2019, which has certain influence around the world. However, there are shortcomings in the input-output ratio of highly cited paper of the fund grants and the activity of international collaboration. It is necessary to formulate targeted policies to guide the development of China’s engineering field.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮