| 何奥成,陈仕吉.中美图书馆学术化趋势对比研究[J].情报工程,2025,(6):056-069 |
| 中美图书馆学术化趋势对比研究 |
| A Comparative Study on the Academicization Trends of Libraries in China and the United States |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 图书馆；学术化趋势；中美对比；文献计量；论文产出 |
| 英文关键词: Libraries; Academicization Trends; China-US Comparison; Bibliometrics; Paper Output |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 何奥成 | 杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 杭州 310018 | | 陈仕吉 | 杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 杭州 310018 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 40 |
| 全文下载次数: 55 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的/意义]通过图书馆发文数据探讨中美两国图书馆学术化的趋势及其差异，对推动我国图书馆学术化发展具有重要意义。[方法/过程]以近十年知网和 Web of Science 数据库为数据来源，选取发文单位为图书馆的期刊论文作为研究样本。采用 CiteSpace 等可视化工具和信息计量学方法，从发文量、被引量、图书馆论文占比、学术合作模式、关键词突现及时间线图谱等角度进行分析，分析中美图书馆学术化的趋势及其差异。[局限]仅从图书馆发表文献的方面探究学术化趋势，具有一定的局限性。[结果/结论]研究发现，美国图书馆界展现出了较为稳定且显著的学术化发展趋势，而中国图书馆尽管科研内容仍保持着一定的创新性，但学术化进程却持续衰弱。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective/Significance] By analyzing publication data from libraries, this study explores the trends and differences in the academicization of libraries in China and the United States, which is of great significance for promoting the academic development of libraries in China. [Methods/Processes] Using CNKI and Web of Science databases as data sources over the past decade, this study selected journal papers published by libraries as research samples.Through visualization tools like CiteSpace and information metrics analysis, we examined publication volume, citation counts, library paper proportion, academic collaboration patterns, keyword prominence, and timeline mapping to reveal the trends and differences in academicization between Chinese and American libraries. [Limitations] The study is limited to exploring academicization trends solely from the perspective of library publications. [Results/Conclusions] The study found that the American library community has shown a relatively stable and significant trend of academicization, while the Chinese library, despite maintaining a certain degree of innovation in research content, has seen a continuous decline in its academicization process. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
