文章摘要
陈仕吉,邱均平.一流学科评价的现状、问题及建议[J].情报工程,2020,6(4):015-025
一流学科评价的现状、问题及建议
The Research Status, Problems and Suggestion on Evaluation of First-Classes Subject
  
DOI:10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2020.04.002
中文关键词: 一流学科;学科评价;“ 双一流 ” 建设
英文关键词: First-Class Discipline; discipline evaluation; “Double first-class” construction
基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目 “ 基于大数据的科教评价信息云平台构建和智能服务研究 ”(19ZDA348)。
作者单位
陈仕吉 1.杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 杭州 310018;2.浙江高等教育研究院 杭州 310018 
邱均平 1.杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 杭州 310018;2.浙江高等教育研究院 杭州 310018 
摘要点击次数: 50
全文下载次数: 40
中文摘要:
      一流学科建设是一流大学的核心和基础,建设一流大学离不开一流学科的支撑。因此,一流学科的评价在 “ 双一流 ” 建设过程中也显得格外重要。目前一流学科评价研究主要集中在一流学科评价理论研究、一流学科评价指标体系构建和一流学科评价中国特色与国际化三个方面。值得注意的是,一流学科的 “ 学科 ” 来源于不同的学科分类体系,“ 一流 ” 的含义和标准也仍存在争议。本文通过分析一流学科评价研究的现状和问题,对一流学科中的 “ 学科 ” 和 “ 一流 ” 的含义进一步明确和阐述,最后针对一流学科评价存在的问题提供出相应对策和建议。
英文摘要:
      The construction of first-class discipline is the core and foundation of first-class universities, and it is inseparable from the support of first-class discipline to build first-class universities. Therefore, the evaluation of first-class discipline is also particularly important in the “double first-class” construction. The current research on the evaluation of first-class discipline mainly focuses on three aspects: the evaluation theory of first-class discipline evaluation, the construction of discipline evaluation indicator system, and the Chinese style and internationalization of first-class discipline evaluation. It is worth noting that the “discipline” of first-class discipline come from different discipline classification systems, and the meaning and standards of “first-class” are still controversial. This article analyzes the current situation and problems of first-class discipline evaluation, and further clarifies and elaborates the meaning of “discipline” and “first-class” in first-class discipline, and finally provides corresponding solutions and suggestions for first-class discipline evaluation.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮