文章摘要
林子婕,梁飞.“被引-关注”耦合视角下的科研机构学术影响力分析研究[J].情报工程,2023,9(6):117-130
“被引-关注”耦合视角下的科研机构学术影响力分析研究
A Study on Academic Influence of Scientific Research Institutions from the Perspective of “Citation-Attention” Coupling
  
DOI:10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2023.06.010
中文关键词: 科研机构;学术影响力;补充计量学
英文关键词: Scientific Research Institutions; Academic Influence; Altmetrics
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“高被引与高关注学术影响力对比研究”(19CTQ027)。
作者单位
林子婕 1. 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038;2. 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871 
梁飞 2. 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871 
摘要点击次数: 100
全文下载次数: 90
中文摘要:
      [目的/意义]通过运用传统计量与补充计量相结合的方法,比较不同学科门类下各类型科研机构的学术影响力,分析当前我国科研机构在不同学科中的影响力现状,为后续科研机构提升学术影响力提供提供参考。[方法/过程]采集了2018-2020年的 SCI 论文数据,并追踪其在 Plum X 平台上的关注数据,将 22 个 ESI 学科划分为七大门类,聚焦高校、科研院所、医院、国家重点实验室四大类型的科研机构,从机构论文的被引频次以及关注量两个角度衡量机构的学术影响力,分析每一学科门类下不同类型的机构影响力表现。[结果/结论]数据分析结果表明,高校是所有学科类型下“高被引 - 高关注”机构的主体;对于医学类学科,少数医院进入了“高被引 - 高关注”队列;科研院所、重点实验室占据了低被引低关注机构的主体;对于各学科类型下的机构,其论文总被引频次与总关注量均呈显著的正相关关系。可以看出,高等院校的学术影响力独占鳌头,不同学科的“高被引 - 高关注”机构类型略有不同,各类型机构的跨学科论文产出较低。
英文摘要:
      [Objective/Significance] By combining traditional measurement with Altmetrics, this paper compares the academic influence of various types of scientific research institutions and analyzes the current status of the influence of Chinese scientific research institutions in different disciplines, which provides a reference for the promotion of academic influence of scientific research institutions. [Methods/Processes] In this paper, the data of SCI papers from 2018 to 2020 were collected, and their attention data on Plum X platform were tracked. By dividing the 22 ESI disciplines into seven categories, this paper focuses on four types of scientific research institutions: universities, research institutes, hospitals, and state key laboratories, and measures the academic influence of institutions from the perspectives of citation and attention, and analyzes the influence performance of different types of institutions in each discipline. [Results/Conclusions] The result of data analysis shows that universities are the main body of highly-cited and highly-attention institutions in all subject types. For medical disciplines, a few hospitals entered the highly-cited and highly-attention institutions cohort; research institutes and key laboratories occupy the main body of institutions with low citation and low attention; there is a significant positive correlation between the citation and the attention of papers published by the institutions. It can be seen that the academic influence of universities leads the way, and the types of institutions with high citation and high attention are slightly different in different disciplines, and the output of interdisciplinary papers from different types of institutions is low.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮